Accenture plc

ACN · Technology · $93.0B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · · not refreshed in 35 days · Narrow moat ·

Wonderful & reasonably priced

Narrow moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

91

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $50.5B to $69.7B, increasing; diluted EPS 9.16 to 12.15, increasing.

56

Median gross margin 31.7% over 10y, very stable.

100

Median ROIC 54.6%, above the 12% hurdle in 100% of years.

73

Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage 45x.

75

Owner earnings changed +7.7%/yr over up to the ten most recent annual observations.

Price vs. value if growth stopped today

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
8% above value if growth stopped today
$7.8B
$136.25
$220.73
$146.99
8% above value if growth stopped today

What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~2%/yr over 5 years. The zero-growth estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).

How to read this

We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.

This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY

Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 4% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

19 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Accenture plc booked $69.7B of revenue in FY2025 in the Technology sector and kept 31.9% of it as gross profit — a moderate-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 11.0% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $25.3B (FY2008) to $69.7B (FY2025) — about 6.1% a year compounded over 17 years.

It earned 39.6% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 12-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 58.3%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 54.6%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 100/100.

ACN's latest filed year, FY2025, doesn't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so current leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.

Put together: Returns on Capital is the strongest of the five filters (100/100) and Pricing Power the weakest (56/100), which is how ACN lands at 79/100 — a Narrow moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2007–FY2025 · 19 fiscal years, normalized from ACN’s SEC filings

Sales, as filed$69.7B FY2025
$0$50B2007201320192025
Revenue kept after cost of goods31.9% FY2025
0%20%2007201320192025
Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC 39.6% FY2025

Not meaningful FY2013: invested capital is negative (cash exceeds debt + equity)

0%200%400%2007201320192025
Cash an owner could take out$8.4B FY2025
$0$5B2007201320192025

The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Visual explainers

The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.

Moat Score history

16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale79.0 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 26, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for ACN.

Track record

How Accenture plc’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

Point-in-time scores 20112025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored ACN on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatPoint-in-time Moat Score1002005001,000Indexed price · log scale (2012 = 100)201120142017202020232026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the 13 years ACN rated Wide-moat (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024), the median forward total return that followed — measured only after each year’s filings were public — was:

  • 1 year 18% vs the S&P 500’s 17% (price basis) · median over 13 years
  • 3 years 55% vs the S&P 500’s 31% (price basis) · median over 11 years
  • 5 years 152% vs the S&P 500’s 84% (price basis) · median over 9 years

These are medians computed from the data, not a claim about any one year. The company figures are total returns (dividends reinvested); the S&P 500 is the price-only ^GSPC index, which excludes dividends and so understates the index — the gap flatters the company. A quality rating is not a return forecast, and past returns don’t predict future ones. Educational only, not investment advice.

Technology context

#61 of 744 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #59NXT Nextpower Inc.79.4 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  2. #60APH AMPHENOL CORP /DE/79.0 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  3. #62MSI MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.78.7 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  4. #63CLS CELESTICA INC.78.7 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat

Compare ACN with its nearest peersAll Technology companies on the Index →

Common questions about ACN

Does Accenture plc have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores Accenture plc (ACN) 79.0 out of 100 — a Narrow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 91, pricing power 56, returns on capital 100, balance-sheet safety 73, capital allocation 75.
Is ACN trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $136.25 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $146.99, that is 8% above value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has ACN's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 79.0 out of 100 (narrow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.