2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $5.5B to $7.4B, increasing; diluted EPS 4.25 to 6.40, increasing.
60
Median gross margin 34.6% over 10y, very stable.
54
Median ROIC 12.6%, above the 12% hurdle in 60% of years.
89
Net debt/EBITDA 0.8x, interest coverage 24x.
80
Owner earnings changed +12.2%/yr over up to the ten most recent annual observations.
Price vs. value if growth stopped today
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
229% above value if growth stopped today
$1.5B
$73.49
$119.05
$241.97
229% above value if growth stopped today
What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~27%/yr over 5 years. The zero-growth estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).
How to read this
We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.
This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.
Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.
Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 4% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
20 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
AMETEK, Inc. booked $7.4B of revenue in FY2025 in the Industrials sector and kept 36.0% of it as gross profit — a solid-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 20.0% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
Across the filed record, revenue grew from $2.1B (FY2007) to $7.4B (FY2025) — about 7.1% a year compounded over 18 years.
It earned 12.6% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 19-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 12.8%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 12.6%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 54/100.
The balance sheet carried $2.3B of total debt in FY2025 against $1.8B of owner earnings — roughly 1.3 years of owner earnings to retire it all. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 89/100.
Put together: Business Trend is the strongest of the five filters (95/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (54/100), which is how AME lands at 76/100 — a Narrow moat.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
FY2006–FY2025 · 20 fiscal years, normalized from AME’s SEC filings
Sales, as filed$7.4B FY2025Revenue kept after cost of goods36.0% FY2025Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC 12.6% FY2025Cash an owner could take out$1.8B FY2025
Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in AME’s filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
The Bolt-On Acquisition Program: Stress-Testing AMETEK's Moat
An editorial reading of AMETEK, Inc.’s filed financial history. Scores, sub-scores, rank and valuation figures are read from this page’s own score card as you loaded it rather than written into the text, so they move when the filings do. Figures quoted from company releases and filings carry the document and its date in the sentence that uses them.
The claim on this page is specific. The registry scores AMETEK, Inc. at 75.8 out of 100 — a narrow moat on FY2025 filings — and the claim underneath that number is that AMETEK's advantage isn't any single product line. It's the acquisition system itself: a decades-running routine of buying niche instrument and precision-component makers, folding them in, and keeping their economics. Capital allocation scores 80 of 100 (Owner earnings +12.2%/yr, share count flat.). Revenue and EPS trend scores 95. Balance-sheet safety scores 89.
That's the thesis. Now let's try to break it.
Test one: is the growth bought, not earned?
The registry's long arc looks clean — but a serial acquirer's revenue line always looks clean. How much walked in via wire transfer?
The recent acquisition record is dense. AMETEK completed its acquisition of Paragon Medical on December 8, 2023, for approximately $1.9 billion in cash against roughly $500 million in annual sales, per AMETEK's December 2023 announcement. AMETEK's third-quarter 2024 10-Q shows $117.5 million paid in October 2024, net of cash acquired, for Virtek Vision International, a laser-projection maker with about $40 million in annual sales. AMETEK announced Kern Microtechnik, an ultra-precision machining specialist, on February 4, 2025. And on July 21, 2025, AMETEK completed its purchase of FARO Technologies at $44.00 per share — roughly $920 million for a 3D-metrology business with about $340 million in annual sales, per AMETEK's completion release of that date. That's four acquisitions in 19 months.
So does anything grow without a check attached? Recently, yes. In its August 4, 2026 release titled “AMETEK Announces Record Second Quarter 2026 Results and Raises Full Year Guidance,” AMETEK reported record second-quarter sales of $2.04 billion, up 15%, of which 10% was organic growth. Orders were $2.3 billion, up 28%. One quarter isn't a decade. And the organic-versus-acquired split across the full filed financial history isn't establishable from any named source we found — that gap is stated here rather than papered over. Verdict: the recent organic engine is documented; the long-run decomposition isn't.
Test two: does the buying erode the returns?
This is where the thesis takes real damage. Returns on capital is AMETEK's weakest filter, at 54 of 100 — the lowest of the five sub-scores on this page — and the registry's own reading is: Median ROIC 12.6%, above the 12% hurdle in 60% of years. Serial acquisition explains the drag mechanically: every deal loads purchase price onto invested capital. Paying $1.9 billion for Paragon's roughly $500 million in sales — both figures from AMETEK's December 2023 announcement — is about 3.8 times revenue, and capital deployed at that price has to work hard before it clears the hurdle.
14 of 19 measured years clear the 12% return hurdle — most, but not all. That is a passing majority, not a clean sweep. The registry's own tiering currently reads narrow moat.
Test three: what happens if the acquisitions stop?
Two facts frame the financing question here. First, balance-sheet safety scores 89 of 100 (Net debt/EBITDA 0.8x, interest coverage 24x.). But AMETEK's FY2025 Form 10-K says higher borrowings under its revolving credit facility tied to the December 2023 Paragon acquisition increased 2024 interest expense. The score is strong; the acquisition system is not debt-free. Second, pricing power scores 60 (Median gross margin 34.6% over 10y, very stable.) — the acquired businesses, once inside, hold their margin.
But the valuation math is unforgiving on this exact question. The registry's zero-growth baseline — what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady — is $73.49, against a recent price of $241.97. At that price the expectations lens on this page solves for owner earnings growing about 27% a year for 5 years. The capital-allocation note above records what the filed financial history actually delivered; set the two side by side. If acquisitions pause, whatever gap remains has to be closed from somewhere the record hasn't shown.
That test fails. Not the moat — the price.
What survived
The thesis holds, trimmed. The acquisition system is real, named, and recent: Paragon (December 2023), Virtek (October 2024), Kern (announced February 2025), FARO (July 2025), all per AMETEK's own releases and filings. The balance-sheet score is strong, though the financing disclosure above shows the system has used borrowing. Organic growth showed up when checked, at 10% in the quarter reported August 4, 2026. On the return hurdle, 14 of 19 measured years clear 12%, most but not all. The live registry tier remains narrow moat, and the price carries the growth expectation set out above. A narrow moat priced at an implied 27% a year is a fine business and a demanding entry. Those are different findings. Both belong on the page.
The paper trail, laid out: this registry page for AME, read as you loaded it (all scores, sub-scores, ROIC, owner-earnings and valuation figures) · AMETEK announcement, December 2023 (Paragon Medical, $1.9 billion, $500 million in sales; completed December 8, 2023) · AMETEK Form 10-Q, third quarter 2024 (Virtek Vision, $117.5 million, October 2024) · AMETEK news release, February 4, 2025 (Kern Microtechnik) · AMETEK completion release, July 21, 2025 (FARO Technologies, $44.00/share, $920 million, $340 million in sales) · AMETEK Form 10-K, FY2025 (Paragon-related revolving-credit borrowings increased 2024 interest expense) · AMETEK release “AMETEK Announces Record Second Quarter 2026 Results and Raises Full Year Guidance,” August 4, 2026 (Q2 2026: record sales $2.04 billion, +15%; organic +10%; orders $2.3 billion, +28%).
Registry figures as of Jul 26, 2026, from filings through FY2025 under moat-index@3.0.0. Educational only — not a recommendation to buy or sell AME. See the disclaimer.
Flagship explainer
How AMETEK, Inc. makes its money
Start with a dollar of revenue and follow what the filing says remains.
Honest partial: the filing did not provide a normalized tag for Research and development, Selling, general and administrative; those components are omitted, not plugged.
Position size uses shares and filed value from each manager’s 13F. Portfolio weight uses the eligible long-share filing denominator. Changes compare only with the immediately preceding calendar quarter.
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Aug 30, 2026.
Partial coverage: the incomplete Form 4 walk cannot establish no activity, an activity date, or zero counts.
Moat Score history
16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten
Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale75.8 / 100
Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Insider activity
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
This machine-readable surface covers SEC ownership filings from 2003; it does not represent earlier paper-era records.
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Aug 30, 2026.
55 filings were skipped because the SEC primary document returned 404; the omission is disclosed and aggregates are withheld.
Among the rows shown, A/F/M acquisition, payment or withholding, and exercise or conversion rows outnumber S sale rows (2 versus 1). The filing codes alone do not establish that every such row arose from a compensation plan.
Trailing-12-month totals and the 90-day cluster result are withheld because this issuer walk is incomplete.
Scroll sideways to see all columns
Insider
Shares owned after
Date
Filing detail
Stanage Nick LDirector
Open-market or private purchase (P)Table I · Acquired · Common Stock
4,000
$255.85
$1,023,400
4,760
Aug 11, 2026
1 filed lot
Table I · Common Stock: 4,000 shares at $255.85 · code P · owned after 4,760 ·
Exercise or conversion of derivative security (M)Table II · Disposed · Stock Option · 1 paired event
6,608
—Exercise or conversion of derivative security (M)
—
0
Aug 7, 2026
1 filed lot
Table II · Stock Option: 6,608 shares at — (Exercise or conversion of derivative security (M)) · code M · owned after 0 · Paired event: 6,608 Stock Option → 6,608 Common Stock ·
How AMETEK, Inc.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
Point-in-time scores 2011–2025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight
Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored AME on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the reconstructed history shown, AME did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Industrials context
#37 of 446 scored Industrials companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores AMETEK, Inc. (AME) 75.8 out of 100 — a Narrow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 95, pricing power 60, returns on capital 54, balance-sheet safety 89, capital allocation 80.
Is AME trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $73.49 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $241.97, that is 229% above value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has AME's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 75.8 out of 100 (narrow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.
Scored from primary SEC filings via the public methodology. Educational only — not a recommendation to buy or sell AME. See the disclaimer.