2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $17.1M to $20.1M, increasing; diluted EPS 0.31 to 0.09, decreasing.
98
Median gross margin 59.0% over 2y, very stable.
58
Median ROIC 14.5%, above the 12% hurdle in 50% of years.
100
Net cash position — no leverage risk.
79
Owner earnings changed +40.2%/yr over up to the ten most recent annual observations.
Price vs. value if growth stopped today
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
23% above value if growth stopped today
$1.7M
$1.75
$1.75
$2.15
23% above value if growth stopped today
What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~4%/yr over 5 years. The zero-growth estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).
How to read this
We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.
This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
17 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
Across the filed record, revenue grew from $12.5M (FY2015) to $20.1M (FY2025) — about 4.9% a year compounded over 10 years.
CRMZ's latest filed year, FY2025, doesn't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so current leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.
Put together: Balance-Sheet Safety is the strongest of the five filters (100/100) and Business Trend the weakest (48/100), which is how CRMZ lands at 77/100 — a Narrow moat.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
FY2009–FY2025 · 17 fiscal years, normalized from CRMZ’s SEC filings
Sales, as filed$20.1M FY2025Revenue kept after cost of goods58.5% FY2018Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC 7.3% FY2025Cash an owner could take out$1.1M FY2025
Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in CRMZ’s filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Flagship explainer
How CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC. makes its money
CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC.'s filing does not supply enough comparable lines for a truthful flow chart — here's what is filed:
· event Dec 31, 2025 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026 · annual-row source set
Curated 19-manager tier
Who reported holding CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC.
Delayed public 13F reports for 2026-Q1—not live positions, trades, or recommendations.
0 holding0 exited0 not holding0/19 resolved19 unavailable
Named manager positions and quarter-over-quarter changes
Manager
Reported position
Quarter-over-quarter
Filing accession
Abrams Capital
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Akre Capital
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Baupost Group
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Berkshire Hathaway
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Brave Warrior Advisors
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Dodge & Cox
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
First Eagle
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Fundsmith
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Gardner Russo & Quinn
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Gates Foundation Trust
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Mairs & Power
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Markel / Markel-Gayner
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Oakmark / Harris Associates
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Pershing Square
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Polen Capital
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Sequoia / Ruane Cunniff
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Southeastern Asset Management
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Tweedy, Browne
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Yacktman Asset Management
Unavailable
Comparison unavailable
Filing unavailable
Position size uses shares and filed value from each manager’s 13F. Portfolio weight uses the eligible long-share filing denominator. Changes compare only with the immediately preceding calendar quarter.
What CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC. insiders reported
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Aug 11, 2026.
Partial coverage: the incomplete Form 4 walk cannot establish no activity, an activity date, or zero counts.
Moat Score history
15 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten
Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale76.9 / 100
Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Insider activity
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
This machine-readable surface covers SEC ownership filings from 2003; it does not represent earlier paper-era records.
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Aug 11, 2026.
8 filings were skipped because the SEC primary document returned 404; the omission is disclosed and aggregates are withheld.
Trailing-12-month totals and the 90-day cluster result are withheld because this issuer walk is incomplete.
No reported Form 4 rows were captured for CRMZ; the incomplete walk cannot establish zero activity, zero counts, or a negative cluster result.
A filing source-event date will appear when a Form 4 row is captured.
Retrieved .
Track record
How CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
Point-in-time scores 2011–2025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight
Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored CRMZ on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the 4 years CRMZ rated Wide-moat (2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025), the median forward total return that followed — measured only after each year’s filings were public — was:
1 year−5%vs the S&P 500’s 24% (price basis)· median over 3 years
3 years6%vs the S&P 500’s 79% (price basis)· median over 1 year
5 yearsNone of the 4 years it rated Wide has a fully elapsed 5-year window with a benchmark to compare against yet.
These are medians computed from the data, not a claim about any one year. The company figures are total returns (dividends reinvested); the S&P 500 is the price-only ^GSPC index, which excludes dividends and so understates the index — the gap flatters the company. A quality rating is not a return forecast, and past returns don’t predict future ones. Educational only, not investment advice.
Technology context
#70 of 744 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Does CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores CREDITRISKMONITOR.COM, INC. (CRMZ) 76.9 out of 100 — a Narrow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 48, pricing power 98, returns on capital 58, balance-sheet safety 100, capital allocation 79.
Is CRMZ trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $1.75 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $2.15, that is 23% above value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has CRMZ's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 15 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 76.9 out of 100 (narrow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.
Scored from primary SEC filings via the public methodology. Educational only — not a recommendation to buy or sell CRMZ. See the disclaimer.