Goldgroup Mining Inc.

GORO · Materials · FY filings · · Not rated ·

Not rated

Not rated
Share / Embed this score
Embed this result

We don't have enough comparable filing data to score at least four of the five filters for GORO, so we don't publish a composite. Missing: businessTrend, pricingPower, returnsOnCapital, balanceSheet, capitalDiscipline. No composite: 5 components abstained (businessTrend: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend.; pricingPower: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power.; returnsOnCapital: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.; balanceSheet: No balance-sheet data available to score safety.; capitalDiscipline: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline.).

Fundamentals

There's no normalized fundamentals series for GORO yet — it appears once the filing processor has handled its filings.

Visual explainers

No filing-backed visual explainer is published for this company yet.

Moat Score history

13 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale17.9 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 23, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedSep 4, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for GORO.

Track record

How Goldgroup Mining Inc.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

Point-in-time scores 20112025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored GORO on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatPoint-in-time Moat Score125102050100Indexed price · log scale (2012 = 100)201120142017202020232026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, GORO did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Materials context

#294 of 309 scored Materials companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #292HYMC HYCROFT MINING HOLDING CORPORATION19.8 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  2. #293ALTO ALTO INGREDIENTS, INC.19.1 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  3. #295TRLEF TRILLION ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC.17.9 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  4. #296CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc.17.7 out of 100, No moatNo moat

All Materials companies on the Index →

Common questions about GORO

Does Goldgroup Mining Inc. have an economic moat?
We don't publish a Moat Score for Goldgroup Mining Inc. (GORO): its SEC filings don't provide enough comparable data to score at least four of the five filters, and the Index records each gap rather than a guessed number. Missing inputs: revenue and EPS trend, pricing power, returns on capital, balance-sheet safety, capital allocation.
How has GORO's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 13 readings since Jul 17, 2026, none with a composite — GORO hasn't had enough comparable filing data to score. No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Sep 4, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.