GXAI · Technology · $4.3M mkt cap · FY2025 filings · · No moat ·
Doesn't clear the bar
2023–2025 (latest 3 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $256 to $1.9M, increasing; diluted EPS -3.90 to -0.55, increasing. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.
Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power.
Median ROIC -131.6%, above the 12% hurdle in 0% of years.
Net cash position — no leverage risk.
Owner earnings changed trend unclear over up to the ten most recent annual observations.
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. Flag status unavailable — four adjacent recent FY revenue observations are required.
Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 227% above the zero-growth estimate across 49 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.
Score records captured Sep 19, 2026.
FTNT, IBEX, META, MEDP, MSFT, GOOG, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, RMD, GRMN, PCTY, EAT, UI, SSD, MNST, DOCS, LRCX, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, ROL, CTAS, PAYC, IRMD, DECK, MORN, INTU, JKHY, TPR, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, LOPE
Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
It earned −31.6% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 4-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was −131.6%. Over the v3 recent window (4 measurable filed years), median ROIC was −131.6%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 0/100.
GXAI's latest filed year, FY2025, doesn't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so current leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
Not disclosed in GXAI’s filings for these years — we don’t estimate it.
Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.
Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.
The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Flagship explainer
Gaxos.ai Inc.'s filing does not supply enough comparable lines for a truthful flow chart — here's what is filed:
| Filed line | Value | % of revenue | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.9M | 100% |
| |
| −$4.9M | −254% |
| |
| −$3.9M | −202% |
|
Flagship explainer
Gaxos.ai Inc.'s filing tags don't support a full breakdown — here's what is filed:
| Filed line | Value | % of assets | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | $13.4M | 100% |
|
| Cash and equivalents | $840499 | 6% |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | $13.1M | 98% |
|
Flagship explainer
One or more filed inputs needed for the five-factor decomposition are unavailable.
| Input | Value | Fiscal year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income | −$3.9M | FY2025 |
|
| Income before tax | Unavailable | FY2025 |
|
| Operating income | −$4.9M | FY2025 |
|
| Revenue | $1.9M | FY2025 |
|
| Ending assets | $13.4M | FY2025 |
|
| Beginning assets | $17M | FY2024 |
|
| Ending equity | $13.1M | FY2025 |
|
| Beginning equity | $16.6M | FY2024 |
|
Flagship explainer
Gaxos.ai Inc.’s filing does not supply enough provenance-matched cash-flow lines for a truthful flow chart — here’s what is filed:
| Filed line | Value | % of cash from operations | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | −$3.9M | −100% |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | $154667 | 4% |
|
Curated 19-manager tier
Delayed public 13F reports for 2026-Q2—not live positions, trades, or recommendations.
0 holding0 exited0 not holding0/19 resolved19 not retrieved
| Manager | Reported position | Quarter-over-quarter | Filing accession |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abrams Capital | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Akre Capital | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Baupost Group | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Berkshire Hathaway | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Brave Warrior Advisors | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Dodge & Cox | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| First Eagle | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Fundsmith | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Gardner Russo & Quinn | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Gates Foundation Trust | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Mairs & Power | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Markel / Markel-Gayner | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Oakmark / Harris Associates | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Pershing Square | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Polen Capital | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Sequoia / Ruane Cunniff | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Southeastern Asset Management | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Tweedy, Browne | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
| Yacktman Asset Management | Not retrieved | Comparison not retrieved | Filing not retrieved |
Position size uses shares and filed value from each manager’s 13F. Portfolio weight uses the eligible long-share filing denominator. Changes compare only with the immediately preceding calendar quarter.
Flagship explainer
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Sep 20, 2026.
Partial coverage: the incomplete Form 4 walk cannot establish no activity, an activity date, or zero counts.
Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
This machine-readable surface covers SEC ownership filings from 2003; it does not represent earlier paper-era records.
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Sep 20, 2026.
Trailing-12-month totals and the 90-day cluster result are withheld because this issuer walk is incomplete.
No reported Form 4 rows were captured for GXAI; the incomplete walk cannot establish zero activity, zero counts, or a negative cluster result.
A filing source-event date will appear when a Form 4 row is captured.
Retrieved .
How Gaxos.ai Inc.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored GXAI on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The indexed price path isn't available for this company yet; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
In the reconstructed history shown, GXAI did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Outside the top 500 of 749 scored Technology companies by Moat Score.
Compare GXAI with Technology leaders →All Technology companies on the Index →