2022–2024 (latest 3 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $49501 to $1.9M, increasing; diluted EPS 0.01 to -0.02, decreasing.
70
Median gross margin 65.2% over 9y, variable.
—
Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.
55
Net cash position — no leverage risk.
24
Owner earnings changed trend unclear over up to the ten most recent annual observations.
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
Price vs. value if growth stopped today
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
No price data
Not reported
Unavailable — insufficient owner-earnings data
Unavailable — insufficient growth-model data
$0.00
No price data
This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.
Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.
Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
14 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
Resonate Blends, Inc. booked $1.9M of revenue in FY2024 in the Technology sector and kept 65.2% of it as gross profit — a high-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −112.5% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
Across the filed record, revenue grew from $339533 (FY2013) to $1.9M (FY2024) — about 16.9% a year compounded over 11 years.
KOAN's latest filed year, FY2024, doesn't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so current leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
FY2011–FY2024 · 14 fiscal years, normalized from KOAN’s SEC filings
Sales, as filed$1.9M FY2024Revenue kept after cost of goods65.2% FY2024Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROIC
Not disclosed in KOAN’s filings for these years — we don’t estimate it.
Cash an owner could take out−$2.1M FY2024
Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in KOAN’s filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Flagship explainer
How Resonate Blends, Inc. makes its money
Resonate Blends, Inc.'s filing does not supply enough comparable lines for a truthful flow chart — here's what is filed:
· event Dec 31, 2024 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026 · annual-row source set
Curated 19-manager tier
Who reported holding Resonate Blends, Inc.
Delayed public 13F reports for 2026-Q2—not live positions, trades, or recommendations.
0 holding0 exited0 not holding0/19 resolved19 not retrieved
Named manager positions and quarter-over-quarter changes
Manager
Reported position
Quarter-over-quarter
Filing accession
Abrams Capital
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Akre Capital
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Baupost Group
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Berkshire Hathaway
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Brave Warrior Advisors
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Dodge & Cox
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
First Eagle
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Fundsmith
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Gardner Russo & Quinn
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Gates Foundation Trust
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Mairs & Power
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Markel / Markel-Gayner
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Oakmark / Harris Associates
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Pershing Square
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Polen Capital
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Sequoia / Ruane Cunniff
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Southeastern Asset Management
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Tweedy, Browne
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Yacktman Asset Management
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Position size uses shares and filed value from each manager’s 13F. Portfolio weight uses the eligible long-share filing denominator. Changes compare only with the immediately preceding calendar quarter.
Source: Filing source not retrieved · event Jun 30, 2026 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026
Flagship explainer
What Resonate Blends, Inc. insiders reported
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Sep 3, 2026.
Partial coverage: the incomplete Form 4 walk cannot establish no activity, an activity date, or zero counts.
Moat Score history
15 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten
Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale49.7 / 100
Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Insider activity
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
This machine-readable surface covers SEC ownership filings from 2003; it does not represent earlier paper-era records.
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Sep 3, 2026.
43 filings were skipped because the SEC primary document returned 404; the omission is disclosed and aggregates are withheld.
Trailing-12-month totals and the 90-day cluster result are withheld because this issuer walk is incomplete.
No reported Form 4 rows were captured for KOAN; the incomplete walk cannot establish zero activity, zero counts, or a negative cluster result.
A filing source-event date will appear when a Form 4 row is captured.
Retrieved .
Track record
How Resonate Blends, Inc.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
Point-in-time scores 2014–2025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight
Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored KOAN on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the reconstructed history shown, KOAN did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Technology context
#296 of 744 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Based on its FY2024 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores Resonate Blends, Inc. (KOAN) 49.7 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 50, pricing power 70, returns on capital not measurable from the filings, balance-sheet safety 55, capital allocation 24.
How has KOAN's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 15 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 49.7 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.
Scored from primary SEC filings via the public methodology. Educational only — not a recommendation to buy or sell KOAN. See the disclaimer.