LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION

LTBR · Materials · $248.9M mkt cap · FY2025 filings · No moat ·

Doesn't clear the bar

No moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

Revenue & EPS trend11

2010–2017: revenue 7586708.00 to 175446.00, decreasing; diluted EPS -0.68 to -0.68, decreasing. Diluted EPS was derived from net income and diluted weighted-average shares in 8 years where the direct tag was absent. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.

Pricing power68

Median gross margin 39.5% over 2y, very stable.

Returns on capital0

Median ROIC -1770.6%, above the 12% hurdle in 0% of years.

Balance-sheet safety55

Net cash position — no leverage risk.

Capital discipline44

Owner earnings trend unclear, share count n/a.

Price vs. owner-earnings value range

Above estimateBelow estimate
No price data
Owner earnings (normalized)
Value range / share
Conservative high estimate / share
Recent price
$7.45
Price vs. high estimate
No price data

Conservative range under moat-index@2.0.0: low end 11.1×, high end capped at 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

17 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Across the filed record, revenue shrank from $7.6M (FY2010) to $0 (FY2025) — about −100.0% a year compounded over 15 years.

It earned −1631.2% on invested capital in FY2025, with a median of −1167.7% across 12 filed years. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 0/100.

LTBR's filings don't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.

The share count rose 170.6% between FY2010 and FY2025 — existing owners have been diluted over the record. Capital Discipline scores it 44/100.

Put together: Pricing Power is the strongest of the five filters (68/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (0/100), which is how LTBR lands at 36/100 — a None moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2009–FY2025 · 17 fiscal years, normalized from LTBR’s SEC filings

RevenueSales, as filed$0 FY2025
$0$5M2009201520212025
Gross marginRevenue kept after cost of goods39.0% FY2017
0%20%40%2009201520212025
Return on invested capitalOperating profit on the capital employed−1631.2% FY2025
−10000%0%2009201520212025
Owner earningsCash an owner could take out−$7.8M FY2021
−$10M$02009201520212025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in LTBR’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Moat Score history

8 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale35.7 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 20, 2026Jul 21, 2026

Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Track record

How LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

As-of scores 20112025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

As-of Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored LTBR on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatAs-of Moat Score5102050100Indexed price · log scale (2012 = 100)201120142017202020232026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, LTBR did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Materials context

#190 of 304 scored Materials companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #188CLNV CLEAN VISION CORPORATION35.8 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  2. #189FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.35.8 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  3. #191VYST VYSTAR CORPORATION35.6 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  4. #192CBUS Cibus, Inc.35.4 out of 100, No moatNo moat

Compare LTBR with its nearest peersAll Materials companies on the Index →

Common questions about LTBR

Does LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION (LTBR) 35.7 out of 100 — below the Shallow-moat bar, so no moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 11, pricing power 68, returns on capital 0, balance-sheet safety 55, capital discipline 44.
How has LTBR's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 8 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 35.7 out of 100 (no moat). No tier changes on record yet. (A methodology upgrade on Jul 20, 2026 re-based the score; readings across engine versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.