ORBIT INTERNATIONAL CORP
ORBT · Technology · $11.1M mkt cap · FY2013 filings · · Shallow moat ·
Doesn't clear the bar
The five investor questions
2010–2013 (latest 4 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $26.7M to $24.8M, decreasing; diluted EPS -0.66 to -0.58, increasing.
Median gross margin 38.6% over 4y, very stable.
Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.
Net cash position — no leverage risk.
Owner earnings changed trend unclear over up to the ten most recent annual observations.
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
Price vs. value if growth stopped today
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
- Not reported
- Unavailable — insufficient owner-earnings data
- Unavailable — insufficient growth-model data
- $2.45
- No price data
This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.
Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 255% above the zero-growth estimate across 49 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.
Score records captured Oct 25, 2026.
Exactly which 50 companies?
FTNT, IBEX, META, MEDP, MSFT, GOOG, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, CPRT, VEEV, RMD, GRMN, PCTY, EAT, UI, SSD, MNST, DOCS, LRCX, MCO, NTAP, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, ROL, CTAS, PAYC, IRMD, DECK, MORN, INTU, JKHY, TPR, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, LOPE
Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
5 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
ORBIT INTERNATIONAL CORP booked $24.8M of revenue in FY2013 in the Technology sector and kept 37.6% of it as gross profit — a solid-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −10.3% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
The balance sheet carried $0 of total debt in FY2013. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 55/100.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.. Current-year EBIT, tax expense, and non-zero pretax income are required for standard ROIC.
Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.. Current-year EBIT, tax expense, and non-zero pretax income are required for standard ROIC.
The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Visual explainers
The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.
Moat Score history
Score history begins Oct 25, 2026 — the record builds forward from here.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
None yet — ORBT has read Shallow moat for every logged capture since Oct 25, 2026.
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Insider activity
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for ORBT.
Technology context
#356 of 753 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Nearest peers by Moat Score
- #354GRPN Groupon, Inc.47.1 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #355S SENTINELONE, INC47.1 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #357FTAI FTAI AVIATION LTD.46.9 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #358RBLX Roblox Corporation46.8 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
Compare ORBT with its nearest peers →All Technology companies on the Index →
Common questions about ORBT
- Does ORBIT INTERNATIONAL CORP have an economic moat?
- Based on its FY2013 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores ORBIT INTERNATIONAL CORP (ORBT) 46.9 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 18, pricing power 61, returns on capital not measurable from the filings, balance-sheet safety 55, capital allocation 53.
- How has ORBT's Moat Score changed over time?
- The record logs 1 reading since Oct 25, 2026; the latest reads 46.9 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.