OZ Vision Inc.

OZVN · Industrials · FY2025 filings · No moat ·

Doesn't clear the bar

No moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

Revenue & EPS trend20

2023–2025: revenue 296422.00 to 54232.00, decreasing; diluted EPS 0.00 to 0.00, flat. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.

Pricing power0

Median gross margin 9.8% over 8y, variable.

Returns on capital

Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.

Balance-sheet safety78

Net cash position — no leverage risk.

Capital discipline44

Owner earnings trend unclear, share count n/a.

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

Price vs. owner-earnings value range

Above estimateBelow estimate
No price data
Owner earnings (normalized)
Value range / share
Conservative high estimate / share
Recent price
Price vs. high estimate
No price data

Conservative range under moat-index@2.0.0: low end 11.1×, high end capped at 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

9 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

OZ Vision Inc. booked $54232 of revenue in FY2025 in the Industrials sector and kept −0.8% of it as gross profit — a thin-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −121.0% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

Across the filed record, revenue shrank from $130621 (FY2018) to $54232 (FY2025) — about −11.8% a year compounded over 7 years.

OZVN's filings don't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.

The share count rose 88.5% between FY2018 and FY2025 — existing owners have been diluted over the record. Capital Discipline scores it 44/100.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2017–FY2025 · 9 fiscal years, normalized from OZVN’s SEC filings

RevenueSales, as filed$54232 FY2025
$0$500000$1M2017202020232025
Gross marginRevenue kept after cost of goods−0.8% FY2025
0%50%2017202020232025
Return on invested capitalOperating profit on the capital employed

Not disclosed in OZVN’s filings for these years — we don’t estimate it.

Owner earningsCash an owner could take out−$67813 FY2022
−$50000$02017202020232025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in OZVN’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Moat Score history

8 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale35.4 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 20, 2026Jul 21, 2026

Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Track record

How OZ Vision Inc.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

As-of scores 20192025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

As-of Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored OZVN on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatAs-of Moat Score100Indexed price · log scale 2019202020212022202320242025

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The indexed price path isn't available for this company yet; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, OZVN did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Industrials context

#277 of 423 scored Industrials companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #275COOK Traeger, Inc35.7 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  2. #276OCLN ORIGINCLEAR, INC.35.4 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  3. #278GTEC GREENLAND TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING CORPORATION35.3 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  4. #279FET FORUM ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.35.0 out of 100, No moatNo moat

Compare OZVN with its nearest peersAll Industrials companies on the Index →

Common questions about OZVN

Does OZ Vision Inc. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores OZ Vision Inc. (OZVN) 35.4 out of 100 — below the Shallow-moat bar, so no moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 20, pricing power 0, returns on capital not measurable from the filings, balance-sheet safety 78, capital discipline 44.
How has OZVN's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 8 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 35.4 out of 100 (no moat). No tier changes on record yet. (A methodology upgrade on Jul 20, 2026 re-based the score; readings across engine versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.