Quest Resource Holding Corporation

QRHC · Utilities · $25.8M mkt cap · FY2025 filings · No moat ·

Doesn't clear the bar

No moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

50

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $156M to $250M, increasing; diluted EPS 0.08 to -0.73, decreasing. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.

12

Median gross margin 17.3% over 10y, variable.

0

Median ROIC -1.0%, above the 12% hurdle in 0% of years.

28

Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage -1x.

24

Owner earnings changed trend unclear over up to the ten most recent annual observations.

Price vs. value if growth stopped today

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
15% above value if growth stopped today
$2M
$1.07
$1.07
$1.23
15% above value if growth stopped today

What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~3%/yr over 5 years. The zero-growth estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).

How to read this

We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.

This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY

Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

17 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Quest Resource Holding Corporation booked $250M of revenue in FY2025 in the Utilities sector and kept 17.0% of it as gross profit — a thin-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −6.1% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $979833 (FY2011) to $250M (FY2025) — about 48.6% a year compounded over 14 years.

It earned −4.7% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 14-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was −3.5%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was −1.0%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 0/100.

The balance sheet carried $64M of total debt in FY2025. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 28/100.

Put together: Business Trend is the strongest of the five filters (50/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (0/100), which is how QRHC lands at 23/100 — a None moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2009–FY2025 · 17 fiscal years, normalized from QRHC’s SEC filings

Sales, as filed$250M FY2025
$0$200M2009201520212025
Revenue kept after cost of goods17.0% FY2025
0%50%100%2009201520212025
Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC −4.7% FY2025

Not meaningful FY2012: invested capital is negative (cash exceeds debt + equity)

−100%0%2009201520212025
Cash an owner could take out−$10.4M FY2025
−$40M−$20M$02009201520212025

The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Visual explainers

The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.

Moat Score history

15 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale22.6 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 26, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for QRHC.

Utilities context

#86 of 101 scored Utilities companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #84SPRU Spruce Power Holding Corporation23.1 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  2. #85D DOMINION ENERGY, INC22.9 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  3. #87MNTK MONTAUK RENEWABLES, INC.22.2 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  4. #88NFE New Fortress Energy Inc.21.7 out of 100, No moatNo moat

Compare QRHC with its nearest peersAll Utilities companies on the Index →

Common questions about QRHC

Does Quest Resource Holding Corporation have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) 22.6 out of 100 — below the Shallow-moat bar, so no moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 50, pricing power 12, returns on capital 0, balance-sheet safety 28, capital allocation 24.
Is QRHC trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $1.07 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $1.23, that is 15% above value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has QRHC's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 15 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 22.6 out of 100 (no moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.