The Moat Index

SPRINGBIG HOLDINGS, INC.

SBIG · Technology · $242744 mkt cap · FY2025 filings · Shallow moat ·

Doesn't clear the bar

44/ 100
Shallow moat

The four filters

Pricing power100

Median gross margin 73.2% over 5y, very stable.

Returns on capital0

Median ROIC -705.7%, above the 9% hurdle in 0% of years.

Balance-sheet safety28

Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage -1x.

Capital discipline44

Owner earnings trend unclear, share count n/a.

Margin of safety

Above valueOn sale
No price data
Owner earnings (normalized)
Est. intrinsic value / share
Recent price
$0.01
Discount to value
No price data

Conservative model: 9% discount rate, 0% assumed growth (capped at 4%), maintenance capex ≈ min(capex, D&A).

6 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

SPRINGBIG HOLDINGS, INC. booked $22.8M of revenue in FY2025 in the Technology sector and kept 70.0% of it as gross profit — a high-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −14.2% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

The balance sheet carried $9.2M of total debt in FY2025. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 28/100.

Put together: Pricing Power is the strongest of the four filters (100/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (0/100), which is how SBIG lands at 44/100 — a Shallow moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2020–FY2025 · 6 fiscal years, normalized from SBIG’s SEC filings

RevenueSales, as filed$22.8M FY2025
$0$20M2020202220242025
Gross marginRevenue kept after cost of goods70.0% FY2025
0%50%2020202220242025
Return on invested capitalOperating profit on the capital employed−1180.3% FY2022
−1000%−500%0%2020202220242025
Owner earningsCash an owner could take out−$3.2M FY2025
−$10M−$5M$02020202220242025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in SBIG’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Moat Score history

4 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale44.2 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 18, 2026

Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

None yet — SBIG has read Shallow moat for every logged capture since Jul 17, 2026.

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Track record

How SPRINGBIG HOLDINGS, INC.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

As-of scores 20212025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

As-of Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored SBIG on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatAs-of Moat Score0.10.20.5125102050100Indexed price · log scale (2022 = 100)202120222023202420252026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, SBIG did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Technology context

#273 of 579 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #271SMSI Smith Micro Software, Inc.44.2 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  2. #272MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.44.2 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  3. #274NABL N-able, Inc.44.1 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  4. #275BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc.44.0 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat

Compare SBIG with its nearest peersAll Technology companies on the Index →

Common questions about SBIG

Does SPRINGBIG HOLDINGS, INC. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores SPRINGBIG HOLDINGS, INC. (SBIG) 44.2 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The four filters behind that score (each 0–100): pricing power 100, returns on capital 0, balance-sheet safety 28, capital discipline 44.
How has SBIG's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 4 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 44.2 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.
Embed this score on your site

One iframe, no script. The badge shows SBIG’s live Moat Score, updates itself as new filings are scored, and links back here. How it works.

<iframe
  src="https://buylikebuffett.com/embed/SBIG"
  width="340" height="150" style="border:0"
  title="SBIG Moat Score — The Moat Index"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>