SENTINEL HOLDINGS LTD
SNTL · Consumer Discretionary · $33.4M mkt cap · FY2025 filings · No moat ·
Doesn't clear the bar
The four filters
Median gross margin 27.0% over 4y, variable.
Median ROIC -188.1%, above the 9% hurdle in 0% of years.
Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage -9x.
Owner earnings trend unclear, share count growing (dilution).
Margin of safety
- Owner earnings (normalized)
- —
- Est. intrinsic value / share
- —
- Recent price
- $3.45
- Discount to value
- No price data
Conservative model: 9% discount rate, 0% assumed growth (capped at 4%), maintenance capex ≈ min(capex, D&A).
6 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
SENTINEL HOLDINGS LTD booked $1.9M of revenue in FY2025 in the Consumer Discretionary sector and kept 22.7% of it as gross profit — a moderate-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 86.1% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
SNTL's filings don't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.
Put together: Balance-Sheet Safety is the strongest of the four filters (28/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (0/100), which is how SNTL lands at 16/100 — a None moat.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in SNTL’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Moat Score history
Score history begins Jul 18, 2026 — the record builds from here and can’t be backfilled.
Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
None yet — SNTL has read No moat for every logged capture since Jul 18, 2026.
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Track record
How SENTINEL HOLDINGS LTD’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored SNTL on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the reconstructed history shown, SNTL did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Consumer Discretionary context
#336 of 359 scored Consumer Discretionary companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Nearest peers by Moat Score
- #334DAN Dana Incorporated16.0 out of 100, No moatNo moat
- #335GM GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY16.0 out of 100, No moatNo moat
- #337SDOT Sadot Group Inc.15.8 out of 100, No moatNo moat
- #338DFNS T3 DEFENSE INC.15.8 out of 100, No moatNo moat
Compare SNTL with its nearest peers →All Consumer Discretionary companies on the Index →
Common questions about SNTL
- Does SENTINEL HOLDINGS LTD have an economic moat?
- Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores SENTINEL HOLDINGS LTD (SNTL) 15.9 out of 100 — below the Shallow-moat bar, so no moat. The four filters behind that score (each 0–100): pricing power 19, returns on capital 0, balance-sheet safety 28, capital discipline 24.
- How has SNTL's Moat Score changed over time?
- The record logs 1 reading since Jul 18, 2026; the latest reads 15.9 out of 100 (no moat). No tier changes on record yet. The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.