STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.

SWK · Industrials · $14.3B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · · Shallow moat ·

Price verdict withheld — value if growth stopped today unreliable

Shallow moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

35

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $15.3B to $15.1B, decreasing; diluted EPS 10.16 to 2.65, decreasing. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.

47

Median gross margin 33.9% over 10y, stable.

68

Median ROIC 14.3%, above the 12% hurdle in 80% of years.

—

Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet.

17

Owner earnings changed -7.4%/yr over up to the ten most recent annual observations.

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

Price vs. value if growth stopped today

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
167% above value if growth stopped today
$484M
$34.70
$34.70
$92.48
167% above value if growth stopped today

What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~22%/yr over 5 years. The zero-growth estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).

How to read this

We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.

This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. SWK revenue fell in each of the three most recent year-over-year FY comparisons, so this estimate is flagged as unreliable for this company.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 243% above the zero-growth estimate across 49 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Oct 18, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, IBEX, META, MEDP, MSFT, GOOG, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, CPRT, VEEV, RMD, GRMN, PCTY, EAT, UI, SSD, MNST, DOCS, LRCX, MCO, NTAP, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, ROL, CTAS, PAYC, IRMD, DECK, MORN, INTU, JKHY, TPR, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, LOPE

Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

19 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. booked $15.1B of revenue in FY2025 in the Industrials sector and kept 30.3% of it as gross profit — a moderate-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 2.7% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $4.4B (FY2008) to $15.1B (FY2025) — about 7.5% a year compounded over 17 years.

ROIC is not available for the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 12-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 13.8%. Over the v3 recent window (5 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 14.3%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 68/100.

The balance sheet carried $5.9B of total debt in FY2025 against $484M of owner earnings — roughly 12.1 years of owner earnings to retire it all.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2007–FY2025 · 19 fiscal years, normalized from SWK’s SEC filings

Sales, as filed$15.1B FY2025
$0$10B2007201320192025
Revenue kept after cost of goods30.3% FY2025
0%20%40%2007201320192025
Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICStandard ROIC 15.9% FY2020

Exact FY and FY-1 financing invested-capital inputs are required.. Current-year EBIT, tax expense, and non-zero pretax income are required for standard ROIC.

0%10%2007201320192025
Cash an owner could take out$484M FY2025
$0$1B2007201320192025

The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Visual explainers

The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.

Moat Score history

31 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale41.6 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 20, 2026Oct 18, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for SWK.

Track record

How STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

Point-in-time scores 2011–2025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored SWK on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatPoint-in-time Moat Score100200Indexed price · log scale (2012 = 100)201120142017202020232026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, SWK did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Industrials context

#234 of 448 scored Industrials companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #232ATI ATI Inc.41.7 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  2. #233CHEF CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.41.7 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  3. #235KLNG KOIL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.41.6 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  4. #236JBI JANUS INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.41.6 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat

Compare SWK with its nearest peers →All Industrials companies on the Index →

Common questions about SWK

Does STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. (SWK) 41.6 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 35, pricing power 47, returns on capital 68, balance-sheet safety not measurable from the filings, capital allocation 17.
Is SWK trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $34.70 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $92.48, that is 167% above value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has SWK's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 31 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 41.6 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.