We don't have enough comparable filing data to score at least four of the five filters for TNET, so we don't publish a composite. Missing: pricingPower, balanceSheet. No composite: 2 components abstained (pricingPower: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power.; balanceSheet: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet.).
15 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
Across the filed record, revenue grew from $1.0B (FY2012) to $5.0B (FY2025) — about 13.0% a year compounded over 13 years.
ROIC is not available for the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 10-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 34.0%. Over the v3 recent window (7 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 40.1%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 100/100.
The balance sheet carried $895M of total debt in FY2025 against $155M of owner earnings — roughly 5.8 years of owner earnings to retire it all.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
FY2011–FY2025 · 15 fiscal years, normalized from TNET’s SEC filings
Sales, as filed$5.0B FY2025Revenue kept after cost of goods
Not disclosed in TNET’s filings for these years — we don’t estimate it.
Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC 45.3% FY2023
Not meaningful FY2017: invested capital is negative (cash exceeds debt + equity)
Cash an owner could take out$155M FY2025
The explained ROIC gaps have filed inputs but no meaningful positive invested-capital denominator. Other gaps mean the item is not in the filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Flagship explainer
How TRINET GROUP, INC. makes its money
TRINET GROUP, INC.'s filing does not supply enough comparable lines for a truthful flow chart — here's what is filed:
· event Dec 31, 2025 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026 · annual-row source set
Curated 19-manager tier
Who reported holding TRINET GROUP, INC.
Delayed public 13F reports for 2026-Q2—not live positions, trades, or recommendations.
0 holding0 exited0 not holding0/19 resolved19 not retrieved
Named manager positions and quarter-over-quarter changes
Manager
Reported position
Quarter-over-quarter
Filing accession
Abrams Capital
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Akre Capital
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Baupost Group
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Berkshire Hathaway
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Brave Warrior Advisors
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Dodge & Cox
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
First Eagle
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Fundsmith
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Gardner Russo & Quinn
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Gates Foundation Trust
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Mairs & Power
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Markel / Markel-Gayner
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Oakmark / Harris Associates
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Pershing Square
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Polen Capital
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Sequoia / Ruane Cunniff
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Southeastern Asset Management
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Tweedy, Browne
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Yacktman Asset Management
Not retrieved
Comparison not retrieved
Filing not retrieved
Position size uses shares and filed value from each manager’s 13F. Portfolio weight uses the eligible long-share filing denominator. Changes compare only with the immediately preceding calendar quarter.
Source: Filing source not retrieved · event Jun 30, 2026 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026
Flagship explainer
What TRINET GROUP, INC. insiders reported
We could not retrieve insider activity for this rendering; no zero-activity claim is shown.
Unavailable: Form 4 activity could not be retrieved for this rendering.
Moat Score history
16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten
Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale
No composite readings yet — TNET’s filings don’t give the engine enough comparable data to score, and we log that honestly instead of guessing a number.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Insider activity
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for TNET.
Track record
How TRINET GROUP, INC.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
Point-in-time scores 2014–2025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight
Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored TNET on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the 6 years TNET rated Wide-moat (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024), the median forward total return that followed — measured only after each year’s filings were public — was:
1 year−1%vs the S&P 500’s 20% (price basis)· median over 6 years
3 years8%vs the S&P 500’s 25% (price basis)· median over 4 years
5 years16%vs the S&P 500’s 83% (price basis)· median over 2 years
These are medians computed from the data, not a claim about any one year. The company figures are total returns (dividends reinvested); the S&P 500 is the price-only ^GSPC index, which excludes dividends and so understates the index — the gap flatters the company. A quality rating is not a return forecast, and past returns don’t predict future ones. Educational only, not investment advice.
Technology context
Not ranked — TNET doesn’t have enough comparable filing data for a composite score, so we don’t place it on the board.
We don't publish a Moat Score for TRINET GROUP, INC. (TNET): its SEC filings don't provide enough comparable data to score at least four of the five filters, and the Index records each gap rather than a guessed number. Missing inputs: pricing power, balance-sheet safety.
Is TNET trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $83.72 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $61.75, that is 26% below value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has TNET's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026, none with a composite — TNET hasn't had enough comparable filing data to score. No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.
Scored from primary SEC filings via the public methodology. Educational only — not a recommendation to buy or sell TNET. See the disclaimer.