Vertiv Holdings Co
VRT · Technology · $111.1B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · · not refreshed in 35 days · Shallow moat ·
Doesn't clear the bar
The five investor questions
2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $5.0B to $10.2B, increasing; diluted EPS 0.33 to 3.41, increasing. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.
Median gross margin 33.4% over 8y, stable.
Median ROIC 7.9%, above the 12% hurdle in 43% of years.
Net debt/EBITDA 0.6x, interest coverage 21x.
Owner earnings changed trend unclear over up to the ten most recent annual observations.
Price vs. value if growth stopped today
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
- $603M
- $17.52
- $17.52
- $290.36
- 1557% above value if growth stopped today
What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~75%/yr over 5 years. The zero-growth estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).
How to read this
We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.
This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.
Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.
Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.
Exactly which 50 companies?
FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY
Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
10 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
Vertiv Holdings Co booked $10.2B of revenue in FY2025 in the Technology sector and kept 36.3% of it as gross profit — a solid-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 13.0% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
It earned 27.3% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 7-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 7.9%. Over the v3 recent window (7 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 7.9%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 28/100.
The balance sheet carried $2.9B of total debt in FY2025 against $1.4B of owner earnings — roughly 2.0 years of owner earnings to retire it all. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 92/100.
Put together: Business Trend is the strongest of the five filters (95/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (28/100), which is how VRT lands at 59/100 — a Shallow moat.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in VRT’s filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Visual explainers
The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.
Moat Score history
Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.
Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
- Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
- Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
- Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Insider activity
Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”
These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.
This machine-readable surface covers SEC ownership filings from 2003; it does not represent earlier paper-era records.
Records still being gathered — partial as of retrieval Aug 30, 2026.
Trailing-12-month totals and the 90-day cluster result are withheld because this issuer walk is incomplete.
No reported Form 4 rows were captured for VRT; the incomplete walk cannot establish zero activity, zero counts, or a negative cluster result.
A filing source-event date will appear when a Form 4 row is captured.
Retrieved .
Track record
How Vertiv Holdings Co’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored VRT on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the reconstructed history shown, VRT did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Technology context
#202 of 744 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Nearest peers by Moat Score
- #200LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC59.3 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #201DOCU DOCUSIGN, INC.59.2 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #203HHS HARTE HANKS, INC.58.9 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #204IIIV i3 Verticals, Inc.58.9 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
Compare VRT with its nearest peers →All Technology companies on the Index →
Common questions about VRT
- Does Vertiv Holdings Co have an economic moat?
- Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) 59.2 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 95, pricing power 53, returns on capital 28, balance-sheet safety 92, capital allocation 28.
- Is VRT trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
- The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $17.52 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $290.36, that is 1557% above value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
- How has VRT's Moat Score changed over time?
- The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 59.2 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.