The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AAL · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
NMHI · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AAL | NMHI | COSM | CUEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 21 (highest) | 21 (highest) | 21 (highest) | 21 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 13 | 48 | 32 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 3 | — | 6 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 0 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| 577% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $9.6B | $112853 | $8.2M | $2.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |