The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TZOO · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AAPL | TZOO | PCTY | CARG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 81 | 95 | 100 (highest) | 53 |
| Pricing power | 63 | 99 (highest) | 93 | 80 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | — | 97 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 94 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 75 | 40 | 27 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 180% above high estimate | 18% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 114% above high estimate | 144% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $4.92T | $110M | $6.9B | $3.4B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |