The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WBI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ABAT | IE | WBI | JELD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 20 | — | 10 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 70 (highest) | 50 | 30 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 40 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 24 | 20 | 64 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 91% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $215M | $1.3B | Not reported | $94M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |