The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ICE · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ASST · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RPC · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ABTC | ICE | ASST | RPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 | 48 (highest) | 46 | 46 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 62 | 37 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 61 | — | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 18 (highest) | 9 | 10 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 25 | 78 (highest) | 4 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 85 (highest) | 63 | 74 |
| No price data | 112% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $91.6B | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |