The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ABX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SNEX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HNNA · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BEN · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureABXSNEXHNNABEN
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5771 (highest)5332
Pricing power100 (highest)70
Returns on capital24093 (highest)64
Balance-sheet safety93766 (highest)
Capital allocation60 (highest)60 (highest)1737
310% above value if growth stopped today44% above value if growth stopped todayAround the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)73% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$1.0B$3.9B$77.5M$16.9B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025