The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ACGP · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ACGP | VMNT | DRK | UPXI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 | 34 (highest) | 33 | 32 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 7 | 50 | 15 |
| Pricing power | — | 99 (highest) | 18 | 66 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 50 (highest) | 34 | 44 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.4M | $7M | $76.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 |