The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ACI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

IMKTA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RRR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BRLT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureACIIMKTARRRBRLT
Moat Score (0–100)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)47 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend4266 (highest)23
Pricing power504378 (highest)
Returns on capital502852 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety956 (highest)255
Capital allocation81 (highest)596730
No price dataNo price data214% above value if growth stopped today60% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market capNot reportedNot reported$6.6B$16.8M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025