The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EXPD · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ACMR | FIX | IBP | EXPD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 79 (highest) | 79 (highest) | 79 (highest) | 78 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 30 |
| Pricing power | 78 (highest) | 31 | 49 | — |
| Returns on capital | 70 | 100 (highest) | 83 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 89 | 73 | 63 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 62 | 91 | 100 (highest) | 84 |
| No price data | 1597% above value if growth stopped today | 127% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 154% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $61.0B | $6.1B | $23.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |