The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AEE · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HTO · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SR · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WMB · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureAEEHTOSRWMB
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)35
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend8998 (highest)5478
Pricing power——80—
Returns on capital20037 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2 (highest)112 (highest)
Capital allocation51 (highest)454324
128% above value if growth stopped today121% above value if growth stopped today74% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)252% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$29.3B$2.1B$4.8B$87.1B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025