The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AEVA · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

INHD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FATAQ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

WOOF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureAEVAINHDFATAQWOOF
Moat Score (0–100)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend60 (highest)335541
Pricing power066 (highest)
Returns on capital005 (highest)5 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)281
Capital allocation24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price data15% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$914M$511M$1725$747M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2024FY2026