The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AGLY · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AGLY | ALV | ELA | HEI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 59 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 74 | 58 | 89 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 29 | 28 | 37 |
| Returns on capital | — | 70 | 93 (highest) | 63 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 62 | 73 | 48 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 68 (highest) | 51 | 60 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | Around the high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 208% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $8.8B | $557.4M | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |