The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TEAM · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AGYS | HQI | TEAM | PLXS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 46 | 70 | 72 |
| Pricing power | 92 | 70 | 100 (highest) | 27 |
| Returns on capital | 13 | 56 | — | 75 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 55 | 66 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 80 | 34 | 83 (highest) |
| 793% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 342% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $2.8B | Not reported | $22.7B | $6.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |