The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GROW · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ILLR · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
IVZ · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AIFC | GROW | ILLR | IVZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 | 32 (highest) | 29 | 19 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 10 | 45 (highest) | 21 |
| Pricing power | 26 | — | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 7 (highest) | 0 | 2 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 56 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | 9% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 84% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $54.8M | $31.9M | $209M | $13.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |