The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AIR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
QSP · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WW · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AIR | QSP | WW | M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 90 (highest) | — | 7 | 29 |
| Pricing power | 24 | 97 (highest) | 89 | 61 |
| Returns on capital | — | 34 | 88 (highest) | 49 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 34 | 40 | — | 60 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 38 | 24 | 60 (highest) |
| 404% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 52% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $5.0B | Not reported | $180M | $6.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |