The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AIRO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

TNL · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

STRT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RMTG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureAIROTNLSTRTRMTG
Moat Score (0–100)51 (highest)51 (highest)51 (highest)50
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend596788 (highest)60
Pricing power94100 (highest)1062
Returns on capital045 (highest)22—
Balance-sheet safety55173 (highest)55
Capital allocation444060 (highest)24
No price data14% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)6% below value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$166M$4.0B$241M$524245
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2026FY2025