The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ALK · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ALK | SEB | SUNE | VELO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 (highest) | 33 | 22 | 54 |
| Pricing power | — | 6 | 32 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 18 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 39 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 33 | 76 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 104% above high estimate | 22% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $5.3B | $4.3B | $8.5M | $245.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |