The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VEEA · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ALMU | KLTR | CNXC | VEEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 40 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 (highest) | 53 | 55 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 40 | 98 (highest) | 62 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 34 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 71% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $170M | $214M | $1.7B | $244M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |