The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ALOY · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MAGN · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DEC · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

NRIS · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureALOYMAGNDECNRIS
Moat Score (0–100)25 (highest)25 (highest)25 (highest)25 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend60 (highest)2427
Pricing power47 (highest)1
Returns on capital0061 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)01428 (highest)
Capital allocation2464 (highest)044
No price dataNo price data84% below value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$30.3M$488M$1.0B$14.2M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026