The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ALTI · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WHG · Other · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FRHC · Other · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ALTI | WHG | DOMH | FRHC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 | 45 (highest) | 40 | 39 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 50 | 70 (highest) | 27 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 30 (highest) | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 11 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 100 (highest) | 55 | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 18 | 44 (highest) | 25 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 306% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $42.4M | $9.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |