The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ALUR · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
YBGJ · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ALUR | SIBN | ZLAB | YBGJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 7 | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) | 30 |
| Pricing power | 91 | 97 (highest) | 97 (highest) | 87 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $57.9M | $725M | $21.3B | $2.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |