The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AMCCF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

PHIN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DWAY · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

HIGR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureAMCCFPHINDWAYHIGR
Moat Score (0–100)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend60 (highest)545010
Pricing power364070 (highest)48
Returns on capital30 (highest)200
Balance-sheet safety5372855 (highest)
Capital allocation60 (highest)404439
104% above value if growth stopped today44% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price dataNo price data
Market cap$20.4B$2.6B$2.4M$1M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025