The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AMPL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RMNI · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AMPL | RMNI | CSCO | ORCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) | 72 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 66 | 69 | 61 | 88 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 99 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 96 (highest) | 74 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 74 | 47 | 16 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 44 | 56 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 46% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 269% above high estimate | 86% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $423.2M | $438.4B | $349.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |