The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PRG · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AMTM | PRG | MSGM | AWRE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 49 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 (highest) | 39 | 43 | 36 |
| Pricing power | 29 | — | 80 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 68 (highest) | 9 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 52 | 43 | 73 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 48 | 44 | 52 |
| 146% above value if growth stopped today | 31% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $4.8B | $1.2B | $27.2M | $19.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |