The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FOXF · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

DRVN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PMNT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureANFOXFDRVNPMNT
Moat Score (0–100)4243 (highest)43 (highest)42
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend503682 (highest)37
Pricing power2857—60 (highest)
Returns on capital5371 (highest)5—
Balance-sheet safety40 (highest)28028
Capital allocation—2484 (highest)44
No price data48% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)1736% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$5.6B$773M$2.0B$4.7M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026