The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ANGX · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PRKS · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ANGX | GAIA | PRKS | WBD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 51 | 53 | 55 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 93 | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 49 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 2 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 80 (highest) | 70 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 160% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $685M | $46.5M | Not reported | $63.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |