The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ANNA · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AMR · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ANNA | CHRD | AMR | AVNT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 | 53 (highest) | 52 | 52 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 65 | 34 | 50 |
| Pricing power | — | 97 (highest) | — | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 12 | 77 (highest) | 61 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 46 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 13 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 22% below high estimate | 47% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 31% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $146.3M | $7.3B | $1.8B | $3.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |