The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ARKO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ARKO | AVAV | HLLY | GTIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 32 | 55 (highest) | 49 | 42 |
| Pricing power | — | 55 | 67 (highest) | 23 |
| Returns on capital | 35 (highest) | 7 | 12 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 20 | 28 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 44 | 60 | 64 (highest) |
| 56% above value if growth stopped today | 1883% above value if growth stopped today | 7% below value if growth stopped today | 43% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $879M | $7.6B | $312M | $14.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |