The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RPD · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ATEN | INOD | RPD | DIOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | 80 (highest) | 75 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 66 | 100 (highest) | 54 |
| Returns on capital | 74 (highest) | 14 | — | 42 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 37 | 100 (highest) | 28 | 82 |
| Capital allocation | 33 | 24 | 24 | 82 (highest) |
| 370% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 58% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $2.5B | $1.8B | $625M | $4.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |