The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ANKM · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RDVT · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ATKR | ANKM | PSN | RDVT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 19 | 70 | 95 (highest) | 90 |
| Pricing power | 25 | 70 (highest) | 40 | — |
| Returns on capital | 88 (highest) | — | 8 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 55 | 51 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 24 | 80 (highest) | 24 |
| 61% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 23% above value if growth stopped today | 373% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $2.6B | Not reported | $3.3B | $861M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |