The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ATNI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CNVS · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ATNI | RDI | CNVS | AD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 28 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 43 | 55 (highest) | 33 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 39 | — | 75 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 4 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 16 | 0 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 54 (highest) | 51 | 24 | 17 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 347% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $358M | $32.8M | $55M | $3.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |