The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BBXIB · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ATRO | JRSH | PLBY | BBXIB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 35 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 43 | 20 | 50 |
| Pricing power | 18 | 15 | 86 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 60 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 56 | 60 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 0 | 44 | 64 (highest) |
| No price data | 50% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $58.8M | $138M | $58.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 |