The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UPYY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AWRE | MSGM | AMTM | UPYY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 49 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 43 | 78 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 80 | 29 | 86 |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 9 (highest) | 9 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 (highest) | 52 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 52 | 44 | 80 (highest) | 64 |
| No price data | No price data | 184% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $23.4M | $21.2M | $5.5B | $15.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |