The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
REPX · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RSRV · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AXIL | ETD | REPX | RSRV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 15 | 75 | — |
| Pricing power | 80 | 95 (highest) | — | 90 |
| Returns on capital | 18 | 40 | 55 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 47 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 53 (highest) | 44 | 52 |
| 81% above value if growth stopped today | 35% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 15% below value if growth stopped today | 55% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $37.4M | $505M | $1.1B | $34.3M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |