The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AZIO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AZIO | DAN | XWEL | LVO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 15 (highest) | 15 (highest) | 15 (highest) | 15 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 26 (highest) | 15 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 10 | 0 | 11 (highest) | 5 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 11 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 40 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | 620% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $12.9M | $3.0B | $6.4M | $59.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |