The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BBXIB · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PLBY · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ATRO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VSTD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBBXIBPLBYATROVSTD
Moat Score (0–100)3536 (highest)3535
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend502080 (highest)70
Pricing power86 (highest)18
Returns on capital004 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety282856 (highest)28
Capital allocation64 (highest)442044
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$58.8M$138MNot reportedNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2024FY2025FY2025FY2024